Latest news
HardwareMicron

Micron shelves 4F² DRAM and turns to 3D memory

Micron said at its October 21 technology webinar that it will not commercialize 4F² DRAM. The company will continue developing its 6F² design while turning to 3D DRAM, arguing that capacitor placement—not just cell area—limits density.

A minimalist laboratory scene depicting vertical memory cells and the idea of a layered chipAI image
Representative image, generated with AI.Image: 3dsınıfı / FCA AI

In brief

  1. Micron shared its decision at a technology webinar held on October 21.
  2. The 4F² design aims to reduce the area per cell by about one-third compared with the 6F² layout.
  3. Micron argues that overall density is also limited by how closely capacitors can be placed.
  4. The company says it will continue its 6F² DRAM work while focusing on 3D DRAM architectures.

At its technology webinar on October 21, Micron announced that it will not turn its 4F² DRAM cell design into a commercial product. Scott DeBoer, the company’s executive vice president of technology and products, said Micron would not add the design—which it has researched for nearly two decades—to its manufacturing roadmap. Instead, the company will continue developing its 6F² DRAM approach and working on three-dimensional DRAM technologies.

What does 4F² DRAM promise?

The area of a DRAM cell is defined in terms of “F,” the minimum feature that can be printed in a manufacturing process. In the common 6F² layout used today, a cell is 3F long and 2F wide. The 4F² design reduces the cell to 2F × 2F by positioning the transistor channel vertically rather than horizontally.

On paper, this layout could reduce the area per cell by about one-third compared with a 6F² structure. But in Micron’s assessment, shrinking the cell alone does not translate into a proportionally higher memory density. How closely the capacitors can be placed is also one of the factors that limits overall density.

Why is Micron taking a different path?

Despite researching 4F² for a long time, Micron does not consider the design’s projected area advantage sufficient under real manufacturing conditions. The company’s view is that constraints on capacitor placement could diminish the gains from shrinking the cell. Micron is therefore continuing with the 6F² layout and turning to 3D DRAM rather than commercializing 4F².

According to TechPowerUp’s report on the webinar, Micron also said it could manufacture the 4F² design at a higher cost on older process nodes, but sees scaling issues on advanced nodes. The same source notes that the company has been studying a cell structure with vertical-channel transistors for about two decades. The decision does not mean that the 4F² approach has been abandoned across the industry; other memory manufacturers have different strategies.

Separately from TechPowerUp’s report, SammyFans says Micron’s roadmap calls for mass production of 1-delta DRAM at its Boise facility to begin in the second half of 2027, with wafer bonding technology to be integrated into production at the subsequent 1-epsilon node. This timeline is separate information about Micron’s DRAM roadmap and should not be confused with the 4F² decision itself.

Impact on architecture, interior design, and archviz workflows

The announcement does not report any direct changes to architecture or visualization software, or to project files. Micron did not provide a price or release date for any specific memory module in its webinar announcement. The separately reported roadmap concerns the 1-delta and 1-epsilon manufacturing processes; it does not specify workstation compatibility or hardware requirements.

As a result, there is no concrete reason for offices to upgrade their existing computers solely because of the 4F² decision. Until verified information about new memory products and application compatibility becomes available, hardware planning should be based on current workloads and technical requirements. Micron’s strategy shift is worth following as a long-term change in memory manufacturing, rather than as an immediate workstation adjustment.

Sources

1 source
T
TechPowerUptechpowerup.com/354042/micron-walks-away-from-4f-dram-after-two-decades-of-research-bets-on-3d-dram-instead
Summary

Source texts are not republished; short quotes are marked, everything else is our own summary and commentary.

3dsınıfı’s take
3dEditor’s assessment

Micron’s decision shows that a theoretical reduction in cell area alone does not explain manufacturing success. For architecture offices and visualization teams in Turkey, the announcement has no direct, short-term hardware impact; no specific product, price, or workstation compatibility details have been announced.

So, rather than changing purchasing plans prematurely based on 4F² or 3D DRAM, it makes more sense to base decisions on current workloads and verified product specifications. Micron’s next steps on its manufacturing roadmap are worth watching, but until they are backed by details on new products and compatibility, they offer no measurable benefit for office budgets.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn’t Micron commercializing 4F² DRAM?

According to Micron, memory density is not determined by cell area alone; capacitor placement also limits density. The company points to scaling challenges for the 4F² design on advanced process nodes.

What is the difference between 4F² DRAM and 6F² DRAM?

A 4F² cell is defined as 2F × 2F, while a common 6F² cell is 3F × 2F. The 4F² design aims to reduce cell area by about one-third.

Which memory technology is Micron pursuing instead of 4F²?

Micron says it will continue its 6F² DRAM work while working on 3D DRAM.

Comments and the forum are in Turkish.Join the discussion
+

Related news